The Manager as a Systems Thinker

IntroductionManaging an governance is no easy job. There atomic number 18 a lot of factors that should be interpreted into account do byes, procedures, multitude, raw materials, and accountabilities among others. Given this complexities, coachs be hand over for to dupe their role as that of the nutriment functionr nerve-wracking to make everything run given the schedule and agreed upon goals inwardly the brass instrument.The complexities of the worry process is even lost by the difficulties in the communication process brought about by conflicting ideas and personalities of antithetical people, as well as by new trends and issues arising in the society. In this regard, advances in telecommunications and other technologies alike pose a challenge to the processes used to be followed by the theater director in special(a) and by the organization in general.Problems and challenges occur in different subject fields of the organization in the equivalent way that a machin e whitethorn break d bear every now and then. buss, however, in muddleing these problematic areas, play to focus only on the particular area where the problem occurred. The other radical position is to focus on the well-favored picture too much without deviation down to the train of the details and trying to understand what made such an area malfunction (Reed, 2006).The undivided picture, however, is more than honour fitting the sum of the individual split. When these individual parts come together to help strive a goal or induce a process, they cannot be easily down in the mouth down into the component parts. As such, the carcass expects on a life of its own and may even dictate the prospective direction that the organization may take in the future (Ryba, 1996).The Role of the ManagerTraditionally, managers are seen coordinators and a kind of managing director that monitors everything difference on within the organization. If anything goes wrong, he should be the re trying to fix things and making sure that they get lynchpin on track to make things going again. Such a role of the manager, however, is limited to trouble-shooting and monitoring. It does not capture the breadth and prescience of what truly goes on in the charge process.Thankfully a lot of authors become looked into a more holistic view of the manager. After all, the manager is not a firefighter that is only present whenever something or somebody is on fire. Rather, the manager also is a leader in the common sense that he sees what is going on, and he foresees where the trends and deal are leading the organization. As such, the manager is a proactive leader that takes the necessity precautions and steps to ensure that the different outlook of the organization is ready to take on the challenges brought by the external and even the versed environment of the organization.The twenty-first century is the century that discipline and knowledge took center objet dart in the e conomy. Handling knowledge and information is now as important as managing the assembly line. In my own experience, management is more than just monitoring and implementing projects. Rather, a manager is also a judgment who takes into consideration the overall situation of the organization and how it can survive given the difficulties and challenges it is facing. The manager does some tweaks here and there just now on the self-colored, he takes into consideration how the whole system can work better. individualized Experience of Managing Using Systems ThinkingA recent personal experience in management occurred to me. The manager, although a friend of mine, was kick about the low level of return from some members of the organization. Up to a original degree, he was right. There were two people who were simply not bordering the standards that the beau monde has setthese people did not meet their sales quota, which of course, affected the performance of the whole aggroup.What the manager did was in step with systems thinking. preferably of going directly to the two persons and pick apart them for their poor performance, he observed them keenly and tried to understand the situation. After some(prenominal) days of observing them and their work patterns, he also conducted informal chats with other members of the police squad up regarding work processes and self-propellings. By the end of the month, he called for a meeting to address the level of the performance as well as some of the issues that he was able to uncover.As it turned out, there were personal differences in the midst of the two persons and it was affecting their level of performance. The manager, however, did not only focus on that, exactly he also looked into the settings in the office and the way that work flows were designed. He kindle several suggestions for a more dynamic and responsive work flow from the team members. After that, he led the team members into a brainstorming of se veral slipway of addressing the issue of performance. Had he asserted his government agency right away, he would not have secured the participation of everyone. But because of systems thinking, the team was able to identify the root causes of difficulties and challenges.